When giving feedback it is often too easy to say something superficial with no purpose to it such "This is cool" or "Great job" but this feedback has no purpose of support for learners or peers. During my teacher training I have developed an greater variety of feedback and feed forward, feedback being purposeful and direct such as "I like how you have..." or "Something that went well was..." and then the feed forward giving the recipient possible next steps that can be used to improve or adjust their presentation. In the case of the feedback I was given, it allowed me to recognise the strengths of my task and reflect on the weaknesses, it also allows me to consider how I will change my activity to make it more effective.
My group were delayed posting their how to tasks online however, once they did I took time to look at their own how to tasks and comment on them giving them what I thought was supportive feedback and feed forward.
This first activity was written on a word document, it was extensive and overwhelming as the words were not grouped in anyway. The information was however, extensive meaning if I were to use this tool I would have ample information to use. In writing my feedback and feed forward I built on my feedback by giving feedforward in a way that gave my peer opportunities to consider how to improve their activity. Had I have done this again I would have read over the activity to allow for more feedback and feedforward.
This second activity was extensive and well presented. It was also on a word document however, the document contained a variety of colours and groups of text meaning I was able to explore the activity without feeling overwhelmed. In reflecting on my feedback it was more detailed than my first attempt and I was able to discuss the activity more as I did not feel overwhelmed when looking at it. Looking at the style of language I used however, I think that in future I will use more specific language or expand further as some of my comments are vague.
When giving feedback I need to consider the criteria of the activity more as although I was commenting on the effectiveness of the activity for my personal use I did not always consider the criteria in as much detail as I should.
My group were delayed posting their how to tasks online however, once they did I took time to look at their own how to tasks and comment on them giving them what I thought was supportive feedback and feed forward.
This first activity was written on a word document, it was extensive and overwhelming as the words were not grouped in anyway. The information was however, extensive meaning if I were to use this tool I would have ample information to use. In writing my feedback and feed forward I built on my feedback by giving feedforward in a way that gave my peer opportunities to consider how to improve their activity. Had I have done this again I would have read over the activity to allow for more feedback and feedforward.
This second activity was extensive and well presented. It was also on a word document however, the document contained a variety of colours and groups of text meaning I was able to explore the activity without feeling overwhelmed. In reflecting on my feedback it was more detailed than my first attempt and I was able to discuss the activity more as I did not feel overwhelmed when looking at it. Looking at the style of language I used however, I think that in future I will use more specific language or expand further as some of my comments are vague.
When giving feedback I need to consider the criteria of the activity more as although I was commenting on the effectiveness of the activity for my personal use I did not always consider the criteria in as much detail as I should.


Comments
Post a Comment